DAVID BIANCULLI

Founder / Editor

ERIC GOULD

Associate Editor

LINDA DONOVAN

Assistant Editor

KARLE DUNBAR

Social Media Manager

Contributors

ALEX STRACHAN

GERALD JORDAN

ROGER CATLIN

GARY EDGERTON

CANDACE KELLEY

TOM BRINKMOELLER

MONIQUE NAZARETH

DAVID SICILIA

GABRIELA TAMARIZ

NOEL HOLSTON

JONATHAN STORM

 
 
 
 
 
How Things Haven’t Changed: 40 Years Ago 'Adam-12' Addressed Gun Violence
September 13, 2015  | By Ed Martin  | 2 comments
 


The passing of Martin Milner earlier this month (Sept 6) brings to mind thoughts about his best known work in the role of Officer Pete Malloy on the crime-drama classic Adam-12, which ran on NBC from 1968-1975. In an interesting bit of timing, I had just last week watched an episode from the seventh season of that series that recently played on Me-TV. Chillingly titled “Citizen with a Gun,” it addressed an issue of huge importance when it first aired (in March 1975) that has only intensified in the current day: The proliferation of guns.

I didn’t pay much attention to Adam-12 when it ran way back when, but I have checked it out in recent years, and what strikes me most about the show is how it presents most of the officers in the Los Angeles Police Department as hard-working, humble and trustworthy – and always willing to put their lives on the line in the line of duty. It’s interesting to recall that Adam-12 came along at a time when it was increasingly acceptable to refer to cops as “pigs” because of a handful of violent incidents involving law enforcement that fomented media feeding frenzies and galvanized people (especially young people) across the land. Protests against police, many ending in violence, were not uncommon.

Somehow, in the middle of all that, Adam-12 survived and thrived with its depiction of police officers as dedicated public servants who were there to assist and protect us all. (At the risk of inciting a wave of hatred on Twitter and elsewhere, dare I state that I still believe that to be true of most of the men and women who work in law enforcement today?) Central to this message and the continued success of the show were the pitch-perfect performances by Martin Milner and his co-star, Kent McCord, who played Officer Jim Reed (with MIlner, left.) Milner’s Malloy was the tough-talker, though never to my knowledge a “bad” cop. McCord’s Reed was always soft-spoken, even when a gun was pointed in his direction. (Milner and Reed also appeared as Malloy and Reed on a few episodes of the NBC drama Emergency!)

In short, these were two cops everyone wanted to be on patrol in their neighborhoods, especially at a time when the crime rate in this country was exploding. (I should pause here to note that Milner’s first major television role was in the drama Route 66, which ran on CBS from 1960-64. That was before my time as an avid watcher of television, but without 66 most of us would likely never have had the chance to get to know Milner on 12.)

I had intended to write about “Citizen with a Gun” even before learning that Milner had passed, because I found this particular episode to be an invaluable cultural artifact when processed through the current prism of gun-related violence in this country, not to mention the problems with certain law enforcers and police departments.

Guns play a major part in many plotlines during the fast-moving half-hour. In one story, a wife-beater flees out the back door of his home with gun in hand after Malloy and Reed respond to a domestic violence report. When they apprehend him, the husband protests: “What is this? I’m no criminal!” It turns out the gun is not loaded, something the officers didn’t know when they cornered him. “There’s no law against having [a gun] on your own property, is there?” the man complains, explaining that there have been a lot of burglaries in the neighborhood and people should keep guns for their own protection. Disturbingly, the man’s wife does not press charges against her husband. Tellingly, Malloy and Reed never lose their cool dealing with what he has done or the weapon he is holding.

We later learn from a colleague of theirs, Officer Wells, that his wife’s cousin Virginia keeps a gun in her home. When Malloy and Reed meet her at a firing range, where she frequently practices, Virginia says of her decision to get comfortable with a firearm, “I get frightened being alone in my house at night.”

“It’s hard to get through to people,” Malloy cautions. “You buy a gun, you had better treat it with respect.”

Later, Malloy, Reed, Wells and his partner Brady respond to a report about a robbery at a house. When they arrive the owner of the house, a Mr. Devoe, takes a shot at Wells, taking out a backyard birdbath instead. The owner insists that he thought Wells was the robber, who had tried to steal a power saw and was apprehended by the officers. The officers are not pleased, though they remain cool, calm and collected at all times.

“Why hassle me? I have the right to defend myself, don’t I?” the owner protests.

“Yes, you do, Mr. Devoe,” Malloy calmly replies.

“Well, he [the robber] was on my property!” Devoe says.

“Even if he was on your property you have to prove that he threatened you,” Reed advises.

“What am I supposed to do, ask him if he’s armed?” Devoe asks. “What if he was in my house?”

“Well, he wasn’t,” Reed replies. “That could have been some kid crossing your yard.”

“You caught [the robber] with the goods!” Devoe says.

“That’s not enough,” Malloy explains.” If you had shot him we’d be arresting you!”

“That’s terrific!” Devoe fumes in disgust. “Where did you dig up that law?”

“Section 197 of the penal code,” Malloy instantly answers.

“Yeah, I’ll read it the first chance a get,” Devoe replies, his voice filled with condescension.

“I’d recommend you do that,” Malloy advises. “If you’re going to keep a gun in the house you had better know the limitations of your legal rights.”

At that, Devoe runs out of patience. “It’s some kind of game, right? The next time I catch a crook I should drag him into the house before I shoot him … make it nice and legal!”

“Not unless he tries to drag you in first,” Malloy matter-of-factly suggests.

“They sure take care of the punks, don’t they?” Devoe complains. “I can’t even protect my own property!”

“Is a power saw worth killing over?” Reed asks, ending the conversation in that episode.

Unfortunately, it’s a conversation that continues to this day, with greater urgency than ever before.

This column was originally published in the Planet Ed blog on MediaVillage.

 
 
 
 
 
 
Leave a Comment: (No HTML, 1000 chars max)
 
 Name (required)
 
 Email (required) (will not be published)
 
 Website (optional)
 
SAAPX
Type in the verification word shown on the image.
 
 
 Page: 1 of 1  | Go to page: 
2 Comments
 
 
Ed Martin
Adam,

Sorry you misunderstood my statement. We are actually on the same page regarding support for the "vast, vast, vast majority" of police officers. Not everyone on Twitter and other social media outlets agrees, which is why I said what I did. (Also, David Bianculli was not the author of the column.) I hope this clarifies matters. Thank you for reading.
Sep 14, 2015   |  Reply
 
 
Adam H
David, "at the risk of inciting a wave of hatred on Twitter and elsewhere, dare I state that I still believe that to be true of most of the men and women who work in law enforcement today."? Wow, what a ringing endorsement of law enforcement in this country! Who better than a student of the media such as yourself to realize and recognize that the recently shown incidents involving police officers is NOT indicative of the daily conduct or beliefs of the vast, vast, vast majority of police officers who place themselves in danger every day to protect just like Malloy and Reed. Your "fear" of a "wave of hatred" only reflects your cowardious and misaligned views that this belief is held by the majority. Get to know even one police officer and see what's in his heart and you will be enlightened. "Most" men and women...could you be any more pandering or any less supportive?
Sep 13, 2015   |  Reply
 
 
 
 Page: 1 of 1  | Go to page: