DAVID BIANCULLI

Founder / Editor

ERIC GOULD

Associate Editor

LINDA DONOVAN

Assistant Editor

Contributors

ALEX STRACHAN

MIKE HUGHES

KIM AKASS

MONIQUE NAZARETH

ROGER CATLIN

GARY EDGERTON

TOM BRINKMOELLER

GERALD JORDAN

NOEL HOLSTON

 
 
 
 
 
TVWW Wants YOU! -- To Welcome Our New Writers, and Maybe Write a Little Yourself
June 29, 2015  | By David Bianculli  | 50 comments
 

[NOTE: Just posted a new round of replies to your latest wave of responses. Thanks! And keep them coming! -- David]

Here at TVWW, it’s time to share some news, officially introduce some new contributors, and ask for a bit of help – from you, if you’re so inclined. But it's not financial...

TV Worth Watching began as a solo website in 2007, with help and design know-how from Chris Spurgeon and the only still-active founding contributor, Eric Gould. Very quickly, with help from editor and columnist Diane Werts, it expanded to make room for other features and lots of other writers, all of whom I’m proud to display under the TVWW banner. Some have been with us for many years, some have gone and returned, and others have joined us quite recently, adding to our scope and vision as well as our roster.

I’d like to introduce and thank them in a moment, as well as note some backstage changes. But first, a thanks to you, because we all consider you so vital to our little mission here.

One thing that has amazed and impressed me about TV Worth Watching from the beginning has been the intelligence, enthusiasm and civility of its online readership. I suspect it’s because the reason we’re all here, readers as well as writers, is to seek out and celebrate the best that TV has to offer. But even when you readers disagree with us or with one another, or find and correct mistakes, you do so with a polite tone, proper grammar and spelling, and a general enthusiasm for quality rather than snark.

On the web, that’s not only refreshing. It’s damned near unprecedented.

So thanks for that. Thanks, also, for the continued support, whether you’ve discovered us lately or have been reading and commenting for years. And thanks, while I’m at it, for those of you who have expressed understanding that we’re a tiny operation, doing what we can while real life continues to pull all of us in other directions.

The Big Request: But we’re at the precipice of vaulting to the next level – and if we’re going to make that commitment, and do it successfully, we need your help. Don’t panic. I’m not talking about a Kickstarter campaign or anything requiring money – we’ve always refused to ask our readers for any subscription fees or contributions at TVWW, just as we’ve refused to install any pop-up ads.

No, the way to help us right now, if you have the time and motivation, is to write us a few sentences describing your experience with TV Worth Watching: How long you’ve been with us, how regularly you visit, and if it’s helped you find some quality TV shows you might otherwise have missed. That’s it.

If we’re going to be able to get to the next level, demonstrating the worth of TVWW is part of the equation. As one of the writers on this site, I feel one major value we offer is the aggregate expertise of our contributors, many of whom have decades of experience covering television. The other major value, though, is our readership – smart people in search of smart TV. So if you help us describe you, and your perception of TVWW, that’s a big help.

--

TVWW News:

The sad news is the unexpected death, earlier this year, of one of our writers, Donna Plesh. For three decades, she wrote about television, mostly for California’s Santa Ana Register, and was one of the reliably friendly and professional faces at the Television Critics Association press tour. As both critic and interviewer, she was a welcome and strong addition to TVWW.

Before long, though, she was fighting cancer, gamely and bravely. Eventually, she succumbed – though not before apologizing that she wouldn’t be attending the next TCA press tour for us. Like that’s what mattered.

In her honor, we’re keeping her collection of TVWW articles in our active archive, accessible at Donna J. Plesh’s Talking Television. Please peruse them whenever you have time – and you’ll encounter a very sweet spirit.

On the opposite end of the emotional spectrum, the happy news at TVWW is that we continue to add folks to our website family, both in front of and behind the scenes.

Tom Brinkmoeller, one of our earlier contributors, has returned to the fold, reviving his Raised on MTM blog, and we’re very happy to have him back.

You may already have read stories by some of our new columnists: Alex Strachan’s TV That Matters, Barry Garron’s The Itch of Opinion, and Candace Kelley’s Bingeworthy. Each of them is a catch: Alex has been a Canadian TV critic and inquisitive press-tour staple for decades; Barry has clocked many, many years in the TV-critic trenches as well, most notably for The Hollywood Reporter; and Candace is a professor and journalist who’s also a TV producer and writer.

They’re the latest additions to a lineup that continues to impress me – and, I hope, you. Ed Bark (Uncle Barky's Bytes), Noel Holston (The Grassy Noel), Gerald Jordan (Crossing Jordan), and Jonathan Storm (Eye of the Storm) started out as TV critics about when I did, which is really saying something. Ed Martin (Ed Martin's TV Mix) and Bill Brioux (TV Feeds My Family) followed very soon after, and all of us bring our own perspectives and interests to the beat. We even have some relative youngsters, to help make our lineup younger than, say 60 Minutes: Monique Nazareth (MNtv) and Gabriela Tamariz (Streamline). And some intentionally far-flung perspectives, from business history professor David Sicilia (TV Moneyland) and from British TV professors Kim Akass and Janet McCabe (One if by Land, Two if By TV).

Not only couldn’t we make it without the contributions and talent of all these writers, but we wouldn’t want to. To find quality TV, you need quality writers about TV – and we’ve got more of them than any other TV site, period. I’ve grateful to, and proud of, each and every one.

How are we handling all of these contributors and contributions? Right now, barely, with most of the help (okay, all of the help) coming from associate editor Eric Gould (The Cold Light Reader) and our assistant editor, Linda Donovan (Donovan's Blog).

It’s been two years since a sudden death claimed another member of the TVWW family, managing editor Christy Slewinski, whose byline lives on in most of our “This Day in TV History” entries, and we’ve all been treading water ever since.

Meanwhile, readers, thanks for being here, as always. We’re coming up on eight years of daily Best Bets and articles – and we’re not through yet.

Not quite, anyway.

 
 
 
 
 
Leave a Comment: (No HTML, 1000 chars max)
 
 Name (required)
 
 Email (required) (will not be published)
 
RDUWO
Type in the verification word shown on the image.
 
 
 Page: 1 of 3  | Go to page: 
50 Comments
 
 
It seems like you consume a lot of energy. Appreciation for sharing. I participate in your site's reasonable and gigantic information.
Sep 25, 2023   |  Reply
 
 
I participate in your site's reasonable and gigantic information.
Sep 25, 2023   |  Reply
 
 
I'm truly getting a charge out of exploring your meticulously made articles.
Sep 25, 2023   |  Reply
 
 
This is such a staggering asset that you are giving and you offer it inexplicably. I'm definitely worn out on drawing in to track down critical and sharp assessment concerning this.
Aug 15, 2023   |  Reply
 
 
??? ?????? ? ????? eos?????? ? ?? ???????? ?? ??? ? ???? ????. 5? ?? ??? ????? ?? ???? ????? ???? ????????? ???.
Jun 22, 2023   |  Reply
 
 
Helping a particularly overpowering post utilizes a ton of our assets. Appreciation for sharing.
May 11, 2023   |  Reply
 
 
I participate in your site's effective and supportive information. It is associated with an especially charming post with a lot of our resources. Appreciation for sharing. I participated here. View our site, and we will catch up with you.
Mar 23, 2023   |  Reply
 
 
jaeseu
Meeting your article has been a great help to me.
It's late, but I'm so proud to see your post even now.
I always support your writing

?? ???
?? ??? ??
?? ????
? ???
???
https://www.j9korea.com
Feb 14, 2023   |  Reply
 
 
Excellent article. The writing style which you have used in this article is very good and it made the article of better quality.
Jan 23, 2023   |  Reply
 
 
Good step you have written of writing content relating to cooperate sense. Better yet good working skills and hope you write more of this soon.
Jan 16, 2023   |  Reply
 
 
pembuatan bendera, cetak bendera, buat bendera, sablon bendera, bikin bendera, print bendera, vendor bendera, jasa pembuatan bendera, tempat bikin bendera, bendera custom.
Apr 28, 2022   |  Reply
 
 
Dennis P
I have been a TVWW reader for 5 or 6 years and read the daily picks, well, daily. I usually then read any articles that catch my eye which is quite often. I have found many great shows and have avoided many of the bad ones thanks to your writings. With the continuing expansion of cable/satellite TV and original shows appearing now on internet sites and streaming outlets, it is nice to know that someone gives us a heads up when a great show appears in an out of the way place. Thanks for all you do.
Jul 9, 2015   |  Reply
 
David Bianculli
Dear Dennis, I haven't been able to reply until now because of our server crash. But thanks! Glad we're back - and hope you're still there.
Jul 27, 2015
 
 
 
Mark Isenberg
Hello from Florida, I appreciate what David is doing here when not seeing him on the Fresh Air radio program,huh? Anyway,Hannibal has been canceled by NBC but will play out this season till early Sept. Watch it. Great writing,style,music and the whole psychological battle of wills over what body part goes best with a nice chianti? We all want the countdown to Jon Stewart's final run on the Daily Show and not whether Mr. Noah will fail afterward. We all sense Mr.Colbert will do great,better than burnt out Dave did. And no,we don't want Bill Cosby to be shamed to death or talk to Oprah.He can just retire and maybe apologize to the women he druged and his long loving,fooled wife,Camille.Tv is not reality and his best work was on I Spy not on Playboy after Dark with Hugh Hefner,look it up on You Tube....
Jul 8, 2015   |  Reply
 
 
David, I'll bet you know a friend of mine by the name of Jimmie D. Davis. We just met and had a nice chat at a High School reunion. Davis often talks (writes) about all his friends when he worked for the Philadelphia Inquirer (I hope I have the paper's name right). Not once have I ever heard Davis speak ill of his colleagues. (As you probably know, he retired from the Fort Worth Star Telegram a year or so ago.) If you want a real "winner" on your team here, in case he isn't already contributing, you should contact Davis. I am not a newspaper man by profession but I do read a lot and I am retired.
Jul 5, 2015   |  Reply
 
David Bianculli
Dear Casper -- You get credit for prescience, but with the timing, not for originating the thought. Amazingly, I already had reached out to my order boss and asked him to consider coming aboard -- and he has. And I agree: We've just added a real winner to our team. And as Managing Editor, yet...
Jul 27, 2015
 
 
 
Pat Clements
I have been reading TVWW as long as it's been available, usually on a daily basis with my coffee before I jump into the work day. Now, I use it to set the DVR. It's always entertaining, informative, interesting, funny or touching ... I could go on. Many recommendations have led me to new shows or movies, or to appreciate a repeat viewing or to just learn what's out there. I have adopted your coinage of the term "spiderweb" movie to explain why I can't bypass Jaws or The Princess Bride or The Godfather when I am surfing by. Thanks for all your hard work and great insights!
Jul 1, 2015   |  Reply
 
David Bianculli
Dear Pat -- Oh, thanks, really. I love that you relate to my "spiderweb" movie idea. Still gets me all the time - most recently with the umpteenth showing of "All the President's Men." Thanks for being here for, what, coming up on eight years now? Couldn't do it without you -- or, at least, wouldn't.
Jul 2, 2015
 
 
 
Norma Unger
I am very pleased to have someone recommending TV that is worthwhile to watch; it saves a lot of time and energy. I don't know why the recommendations sometimes arrive the day after the show has aired tho. I just go to your website when I don't see anything relevant. Still....it would be nice to have it on time.
Jun 29, 2015   |  Reply
 
David Bianculli
Dear Norma - The reason that happens is if I post the day's bets so late in the day that they miss the morning automatic send feed -- the RSS, or SST, or DDT, or whatever the hell it is. And when that happens, it's always my fault. But it's never simple negligence - just complex life.
Jul 2, 2015
 
 
 
Scott Browne
I have been reading TWW from the beginning after you left the Daily News. I check everyday to see what you are recommending for viewing each day. I read the columns if the subject matter interests me. We were colleagues at the Daily News and I have always enjoyed your work even when I was correcting your "extras."
Jun 29, 2015   |  Reply
 
David Bianculli
Hey, Scott! It must be less stressful to be bale to read me without having to catch and correct my typos and errors. Sorry - I meant to type "able to read me." My mistake. One of many. Hope you're well - and thanks for being here for the whole stretch.
Jul 2, 2015
 
 
 
Charles J. Cohen
I go here once a day, during my lunch break. Which means that I'm disappointed if the daily summary isn't up by Noon. I like some of the longer articles (I read about half), and I've definitely found great shows to watch by visiting here.
Jun 29, 2015   |  Reply
 
David Bianculli
Dear Charles -- Glad to know we're with you on your lunch break. And on days we're not, at least take solace in the fact that, most likely, you're having a better day than I am. Thanks!
Jul 2, 2015
 
 
 
Mary
As a busy mom, TV Worth Watching constitutes my ONLY source of advice on how to spend my precious TV-watching time. It's even got real estate on my Google Chrome Bookmarks bar so I can refer to it daily. I especially love that recommendations run the gamut -- sports, dramas, comedies, documentaries. As a result, your site gets me to watch a wide range of stuff I otherwise wouldn't consider switching to, like golf! Thanks for expanding my world!
Jun 25, 2015   |  Reply
 
David Bianculli
Dear Mary -- Thanks! And Gerald Jordan, our resident golf enthusiast, will be especially happy to hear of your comments. But he does the same thing when I read him... We're honored to be bookmarked. Glad to hear it...
Jun 29, 2015
 
 
 
Abbey
I've been following TVWW on Facebook and visiting the website for a year. I respected David's reviews and interviews on Fresh Air, which led me to visit the site. While pursuing a Master's Degree in Liberal Studies I began to focus my studies on television and found the site to be a great source for me to follow the current reviews and analysis of the television scholars I was reading for my research for papers and presentations. I have used the site for my scholarly work, have presented at a Liberal Studies Conference, and finished my Master's Thesis on nostalgic television, and found TVWW and great source for my scholastic and personal engagements with television. I love reading opinions and recommendations for shows, as watching television can often feel like a solitaire activity, I feel back in a classroom or at the proverbial water-cooler with TVWW. I hope to move forward with my analysis and writing of television and will keep coming back to the well of TVWW for inspiration.
Jun 25, 2015   |  Reply
 
David Bianculli
Dear Abbey -- Not only are we glad to have you here, and pleased by your kind words, but consider this an invitation to contact us about maybe doing a guest contributor's column. You sound more than qualified, and at any rate, I'd be very curious to read your thesis on nostalgic TV. So get in touch, if you're interested.
Jun 29, 2015
 
 
 
 
 Page: 1 of 3  | Go to page: