DAVID BIANCULLI

Founder / Editor

ERIC GOULD

Associate Editor

LINDA DONOVAN

Assistant Editor

Contributors

ALEX STRACHAN

MIKE HUGHES

KIM AKASS

MONIQUE NAZARETH

ROGER CATLIN

GARY EDGERTON

TOM BRINKMOELLER

GERALD JORDAN

NOEL HOLSTON

 
 
 
 
 
When Is It Fair, and Unfair, to Reveal TV Secrets?: Two Case Studies
March 10, 2008  | By David Bianculli
 
I've written plenty about the final episode of The Wire,the excellent David Simon drama that concluded last night - but was careful not to reveal any secrets or discuss the ending. Now that it's been televised, is it fair game? Or is there still a "I've recorded it, but haven't seen it" faction in play?

And what's the point of honoring secrets anyway, if the networks don't?

wire.jpg

Start with The Wire. Here's my position on "spoilers": A well-written preview shouldn't reveal anything that would detract from the audience's enjoyment. Once the program is televised, though, all analysis and details are fair game. If you're a Wire fan, and still have the finale put aside somewhere to watch, then put the rest of this column in the same "futures" pile. I refuse to wait.

My favorite elements of the finale? Mayor Carcetti, all but popping a blood vessel when he learns of the serial-killer scam. Drug-dealer Marlo, so disheartened by going "straight" that he heads straight from the penthouse to the street to confront, and survive, some armed punks. Gus, flashing one last knowing semi-smile from the depths of the copy desk.

And most of all, Bubbles, the heart and soul of the show, finally being allowed to ascend the basement stairs of his sister's home and join them at the kitchen table. At least the newspaper, by profiling Bubbles and changing his sister's opinion of him, did one thing right.

Saddest element? The duplicitous reporter winning the Pulitzer, and the traffic and skyline shots showing the distancing speed and disheartening disparity of city life. The Wire didn't end up offering many solutions. Salute it, though, for shining white-hot spotlights on the endemic, complicated problems.

omarosa.jpg

Now for the flip side of my "fair game" argument. I had forgotten to record The Celebrity Apprentice on NBC Thursday, so I caught a rerun on CNBC a few days later. It was the episode culminating in a terrific, heated showdown between Piers Morgan and Omarosa - and before we found out her fate on the program, it was revealed on a commercial-break promo for the following week's NBC episode.

There was Omarosa with a red circle and slash across her face, and the promise that the next Apprentice would be "Omarosa-free." And now, back to our program. Guess who gets fired?

According to my own "spoiler" position, I guess I can't get too incensed about this. NBC, after all, televised the episode already. But if the only reason to rerun the episode on CNBC is to pick up viewers who didn't watch on NBC, shouldn't that climax-revealing promo have been delayed until the end of the episode, as I'm sure it was on NBC?

Why should critics play fair, if the networks won't?

 

4 Comments

 

Anchorgirl said:

Since I had to work Sunday night, and then get up and head straight back out Monday, I studiously avoided any media that would give me any clues to how "The Wire" ended. I work in news, and expected to see something slugged "The Wire Finale" on the wires, as I did -- and avoided -- when "The Sopranos" ended (sort of). Instead, there was nothing; are my tastes that non-mainstream? (Umm...yeah.) For some reason, Omar's snuffing made the wires, but I managed to dodge that bullet, so to speak.

So whether you offered a spoiler or not, as swell as this blog might be, I wasn't bitin'. And as for "The Apprentice" -- is that show STILL on?!?

By the way, I found "The Wire" finale incredibly satisfying: Michael takes up Omar's mantle; Bunk and Kima (sp?) find their Murder Police Partners groove; Jay gives Jimmy an appropriately vulgar send-off; Bubbs is accepted as a human by his sister (which I hope means poor Duqwan (again, sp?) has redemption in his future; Gus still has a gig; yeah, that weasel wins a Pulitzer but he'll end up like Margaret B. Smith in the end; Marlo's thrill-seeker gene's gonna get him got; and Jimmy (who never got the accent right) does the right thing. Oh, and Lester goes back to makin' miniatures and whoopie with his first-season former pole-dancer squeeze.

Now, if they could only cook up an really fab "Deadwood" finale...or maybe a full final season. Hey, a girl can dream.

Comment posted on March 11, 2008 2:35 AM


Anchorgirl said:

Oh, and perhaps the most satisfying thing about the last season of "The Wire": The real Fran who inspired the character on "The Corner" was the phlebotomist who drew Bubbs's blood for his HIV test.

Comment posted on March 11, 2008 2:56 AM


Harold Check said:

Nice post, David, at least as far as I could tell from the paragraphs I read. I'm still catching up on "The Wire" so I had to skip a few. Obviously the CNBC flub was just an oversight. They probably didn't have a suitably ambiguous promo to run in its place. Tight budgets and all. In any case, if your readers are interested in listening, there's a recent episode (3/07) of Shifting Channels -- a fairly new podcast -- that covers the whole landmine-filled landscape of spoilers -- avoiding them and seeking them out. It's at www.shiftingchannels.com.

Comment posted on March 11, 2008 6:02 PM


Bill Cairns said:

Although I don't watch The Wire (i know, i know) I do agree that spoilers aren't spoilers anymore after an episode has aired--and this is from someone who watches virtually nothing "live" anymore. Once I DVR it, its up to me when I want to watch it, and I can't expect you to wait for me forever! lol
As for The Apprentice, that sort of promo has been a pet peeve of mine for a while. Bravo loves to do that during weekend re-runs of Top Chef or Project Runway, revealing who was ousted that episode *while they're re-running it*! It's such a pain in the neck. If you're actually watching the re-run, it means probably either a) you're a fan who forgot to DVR it, b), you're a fan who doesnt own a DVR. Either way, why would you want to know what happens before you see it?!

Comment posted on March 14, 2008 3:02 PM

 
 
 
 
 
Leave a Comment: (No HTML, 1000 chars max)
 
 Name (required)
 
 Email (required) (will not be published)
 
CQHIV
Type in the verification word shown on the image.